Former U.S. Senator Jon Tester
Great Falls, MT
[For transparency, I am the previous chair and current vice chair of the Cascade County Democrats. The opinions presented here are my own and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Cascade County Democrats. – Helena Lovick]
Last week a message supposedly written by former U.S. Senator Jon Tester leaked. (Tester hasn’t confirmed or denied the text message…pretty clear it’s real.) Many of Tester’s long-time supporters, including myself, are pissed about its content and here’s why.
What was the message about?
The leaked message covered Tester’s thoughts on the Democratic Party, his experience running for office, and what he thinks of the probable run by University of Montana President Seth Bodnar for U.S. Senate (Bodnar resigned late last week).

Former UM President Seth Bodnar
The Good
Before I go off about my personal thoughts about Tester’s views, I’ll first give him some credit. I’ll admit that as a three-term U.S. Senator Tester knows a hell of a lot more than me about what it takes to run for the U.S. Senate and win. In Tester’s opinion, to win the candidate “has to run a near flawless race that is well funded and well staffed.” He also acknowledged that we need a Senator to “fight to stop all the insanity that is going on in our dictatorship today, not rubber stamp it.” Agreed, we certainly need a fighter, not someone ready to bow down to a dictatorship.
The Bad
In the message, Tester praised Bodnar but agreed with consultant Jim Messina that Bodnar can’t win as a Democrat. Tester also appears to support a Bodnar run as an independent, because “a generic independent does about a 8 point swing [against incumbent Daines]” in comparison to a generic Democrat. Before we get into the ugly content of Tester’s message, this already was raising some red flags for the Democratic base. If you abandon our party to win, what does that do to candidates that aren’t afraid to run as a Democrat? IT TAKES VOTES AWAY FROM THE DEMOCRAT. And then neither the Independent nor the Democrat win. Sounds pretty great if you are a Republican.
We saw this exact scenario play out in 2022. In that election, Independent Gary Buchanan threw his hat in the ring for the Montana Eastern U.S. House race. That move took votes away from the Democratic candidate Penny Ronning, but not the Republican Matt Rosendale. And for what?? Both Ronning and Buchanan lost and let Matt Rosendale (gag) easily carry the race with 56.5% of the vote. I would not encourage a left-leaning candidate to run as an independent in a Senate race that already has a Democratic candidate. In Montana, in our current political climate, you are dooming them both. And honestly, the consultant class doesn’t care, because they will make money if Bodnar runs as an Independent, no matter the outcome of the election.
The Ugly
Ok, I have some ick thinking of a Democrat encouraging an Independent to run over another Democrat, but what was ugly about Tester’s message?
Throughout his message, Tester made numerous jabs at Democrats:
- “…every race I ran … was about distancing myself from the Democratic Party.”
- “During my last two races the democratic Party was poison in my attempts to get re-elected.”
- “[the Democratic party] was a hell of an anvil.”
- [about Reilly Neill currently running for U.S. Senate against Daines] “We can watch her talk about trans rights, democracy and bathrooms…BTW she will lose by 25, but she is a Democrat.”
Political Parties Can Change
First, a political party isn’t static or an unchangeable institution. THE PARTY IS THE PEOPLE. If you agree with most of a party’s political positions, but don’t like something about it… then work to change it! Tester has been entrenched in the Democratic Party of Montana for over three decades. If it’s been such an anvil, where was the effort to make it better? A U.S. Senator has a huge impact on their home state’s political positions. Use that power to build a bench, to strengthen the party, speak up on party positions! I know, I know, it’s hard. But that’s what it takes if you want to make a difference.
Democrat Reilly Neill deserves respect for her efforts

Democratic U.S. Senate Candidate Reilly Neill
Secondly, what a thing to say about Senate Candidate Reilly Neill. She is a Democratic candidate speaking up in alignment with the Democratic Party’s platform and political positions. Good Democrats DO stand with LGBTQ rights, especially when they are under attack like now. We DO speak up about the rising dictatorship in our country that is threatening our democracy. What else can an ethical candidate do? Appeal to a non-existent middle to try to eke out an 8 point swing to win? An 8 point swing that will never materialize because you will be splitting the vote between an Independent and a Democrat?
Yeah, that’s trash.
Republicans are scared anyway (good)
Even with the potential benefit of vote splitting favoring Daines, Republicans see the winds of change in public opinion now. They have already come out with an attack ad on Seth Bodnar before he even announced. Looks like Daines seat isn’t perfectly invulnerable.
Let’s beat Daines by not splitting our vote. Let’s be strategic and vote for the person unafraid to share their positions on issues, willing to take the heat. That’s a fighter. That’s the kind of person we need to elect. And that is the Democrat who wins the primary in June.
If these are Tester’s views, he is right. In Montana the party, or anyone running against Republicans needs to separate from the left wing nutjobs and make the people of this state their priority. Jon did a good job of that, but now, the right wing is making hay with lies and no one has been standing up without being tied to the left wing nuts. The party either needs to revise itself or start supporting independents.
Well said Helena 👏
I am a Democrat! This email ( I read about it earlier ) was the motive that had me out in the cold scraping Jon’s bumper sticker off my car. I knocked doors for him. To say I was an anvil is insulting. If you want to run as an independent but expect all the democrats to vote for you are crazy and the anvil around our neck. We briefly discussed this after our last central committee meeting. I look forward to a vibrant political year.
I don’t believe there are any independents to be effective they must caucus with Democrats or Republicans or they only vote on bills with no impact on what is brought forward. Choose not really independent or ineffective.
I don’t blame Tester at all. The Montana Dems abandoned rural Dems a decade ago. They only care about the Big 7 and haven’t won anything..except Jon’s previous races..in two decades! I hope Daines goes bye bye but Tester is right Reilly won’t touch him.
YES!!!! 👏👏👏 all of this. ✊
The current election system of plurality voting results in the duopoly and people making unrealistic purity tests and definitions about the two parties.
60% of Montanans identify as independent or loosely affiliated with a party. 75% of Montanans say they vote for the person not the party.
83% of Montana districts are considered safe. Meaning in 83% of the districts, every Montanan knows which of the two major parties is going to win that district…including every democrat. So, if a Democrat runs in a red district, they👏🏼are👏🏼 going 👏🏼to 👏🏼lose. The author claims that the independents care only about the money but not the win, while failing to see the irony in democrats beating their dead horses in red districts across Montana, wasting Dems hard-earned volunteer time and money.
Buchanan didn’t spoil the election…
First of all, Rosendale got more votes than both Buchanan and Ronning combined, so there is objectively no spoiler. But yes, you do have to wonder how many voters wanted to vote for Buchanan, but were worried about wasting their vote.
Ronning could never have won against Rosendale. Buchanan could have.
This isn’t about democrats having the “courage to run,” this is about democrats having the courage and intelligence to win. Not for their party to win, but for more than ZERO of their values to win…and have a candidate they can work with.
Additionally, when the Democrats have the courage and intelligence to bow out in a safe red district and back independents (or solutions-focused Republicans in the primaries) they end up electing a candidate that is more representative of the entire district (instead of extremists from the minority).
Dems in Montana claim they want to stop extremism, but then are stupid (or arrogant) enough to run Democrat candidates against Independents.
If Reilly Neill ACTUALLY cares about her political values…
If Reilly Neill ACTUALLY cares about her party…
If Reilly Neill ACTUALLY wants Zinke to get defeated, she’ll bow out of the race.
democrats let perfect be the enemy of good too often. while I appreciate the point here, it seems like more of the same. all it’s got us is a bunch of gutless right wing liars.
I think we should listen to Jon. anything less is just another vote for fascism whether you like it or not